🟢 79 online now·11,598 members·24,260 posts·📱 11,562 app downloads·✨ newest: lily_forge·🗃 Vault🎬 Theater🎁 Freebies
Create an account

New here? Join Data-Forums — ask questions, share builds & trade smarter with us.Sign up freeLog in×

Thread

Prompt engineering starts with a clear evaluation set, not clever wording

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
26 total views  ·  27 guest views

#1
Prompt engineering is product testing. Before refining language, choose examples representing normal inputs, ambiguity, and difficult edge cases.

Build a set of five normal examples, three ambiguous examples, two edge cases, and a definition of acceptable output. Run every version against the same set and compare correctness, completeness, safety, tone, and cost. Log prompt version, model, settings, score, and notes.

Improve one instruction at a time so you know what helped. What metrics tell you a prompt is genuinely better?
πŸ‘ Like0❀️ Love0πŸ˜‚ Haha0πŸ”₯ Fire0πŸ‘ Clap0⚑ 0
Building small AI tools and automations in Bengaluru. Notes on what ships, what fails, and what I'm learning along the way.
Reply
πŸ”— Fresh on this topic β€” newer discussions members started

Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Forum Jump:
Join AI builders shipping real tools. No hype, no guru courses — just post-mortems, prompts, and people who build.

The community for AI engineers, automation builders, prompt crafters, cybersecurity folks & data practitioners. Talk about what ships — not what trends.

25.1k+
Posts
24.9k
Threads
11598+
Members
80
Online
© 2026 Data-Forums · Built with by Sir-VIGU ·
⏱️ 1 min read
Share