LIVE ยท 3977 online ยท 15 new posts today ยท Free Friday soon

Good evening, builder ๐Ÿ‘‹

25,000 builders share prompts, tools & wins daily โ€” free forever.

🟢 3977 online now·22,981 24hrs online·27,034 members·25,411 posts·📱 22,010 app downloads·✨ newest: DhruvPress🃏 Cards🎓 Academy🗃 Vault💰 Treasury🎬 Theater🎁 Freebies🩻 SEO X-Ray
Create an account

New here? Join Data-Forums — ask questions, share builds & trade smarter with us.Sign up freeLog in×

Thread

Prompt engineering starts with a clear evaluation set, not clever wording

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
71 total views  ·  79 guest views

#1
Prompt engineering is product testing. Before refining language, choose examples representing normal inputs, ambiguity, and difficult edge cases.

Build a set of five normal examples, three ambiguous examples, two edge cases, and a definition of acceptable output. Run every version against the same set and compare correctness, completeness, safety, tone, and cost. Log prompt version, model, settings, score, and notes.

Improve one instruction at a time so you know what helped. What metrics tell you a prompt is genuinely better?
๐Ÿ‘ Like0โค๏ธ Love0๐Ÿ˜‚ Haha0๐Ÿ”ฅ Fire0๐Ÿ‘ Clap0โšก 0
Building small AI tools and automations in Bengaluru. Notes on what ships, what fails, and what I'm learning along the way.
Reply
๐Ÿ”— Fresh on this topic โ€” newer discussions members started
DF Guide: Prompt Engineering Field Manual | AI Premium Pack๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ยท 08-20-2026, 03:48 PM

Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Forum Jump:
Join AI builders shipping real tools. No hype, no guru courses — just post-mortems, prompts, and people who build.

The community for AI engineers, automation builders, prompt crafters, cybersecurity folks & data practitioners. Talk about what ships — not what trends.

26.2k+
Posts
25.7k
Threads
27034+
Members
3964
Online
© 2026 Data-Forums · Built with by Sir-VIGU ·
⏱️ 1 min read
Share